A slick proposal isn't enough to protect your project. The real problems usually show up in whatever never got defined in the first place: how work gets approved, who owns the code, who controls the accounts, how changes get handled, or what maintenance looks like once the project ships.
This isn't about ranking agencies. It's about helping you spot seven warning signs before you sign anything. If you want a full comparison method, check out our guide on choosing a web agency in Morocco instead.
Mistake 1: Accepting a Scope That's Too Vague
"Build a modern, high-performance platform" isn't a scope — it's a wish. The contract needs to spell out the users, the features, the deliverables, who's responsible for what, and what's explicitly excluded.
Skimp on the detail, and you open the door to two different stories: the client assumes a feature is included, while the agency treats it as extra work. When that conflict surfaces, it's rarely about bad faith — it's just that nobody agreed on a shared reference point to begin with.
Check for: a functional appendix, an initial backlog, or a clearly planned scoping phase.
Mistake 2: Skipping Acceptance Criteria
How exactly will you decide a screen, a feature, or the whole project is actually done? "Compliant with the specifications" can stay frustratingly vague if the expected scenarios were never made testable in the first place.
Get clear on:
- what the feature is actually supposed to do;
- which environments and browsers it needs to work on;
- which user roles are covered;
- what test data will be used;
- which bugs are blocking versus non-blocking;
- how testing is handled, and how quickly issues get a response.
Our guide on the steps of a web development project shows exactly where these checkpoints belong.
Mistake 3: Overlooking IP Rights and Source Code
The contract needs to state, in plain terms, who owns the custom code, the design, the documentation, and the content. It also needs to draw a clear line between those and any open-source components, commercial licenses, or third-party tools involved.
Check the terms around handing over the Git repository, any limits on reuse, and exactly when ownership actually transfers to you. If you're paying for custom development, you need to know precisely what you'll be able to use, modify, or take elsewhere.
Check for: ownership clauses, a license inventory, and clear handover terms.
Mistake 4: Leaving Critical Accounts in the Agency's Name
Your domain, hosting, cloud accounts, email tools, app store listings, and payment services shouldn't become inaccessible the moment the relationship with your agency ends.
Best practice is usually to create these critical assets under your own company's name, then grant the agency the access it needs to do its job. Turn on multi-factor authentication, and keep a running list of who owns and administers what.
Check for: an account inventory, clearly assigned roles, and a real recovery procedure.
Mistake 5: Treating Security as a Marketing Line
"Secure website" doesn't actually describe anything concrete. What you need depends entirely on the data involved, the user types, the integrations, and how exposed the product really is.
Ask how they handle:
- access to different environments;
- secrets and API keys;
- backups;
- dependencies and staying current with updates;
- logging and alerts;
- patching once a vulnerability is discovered;
- personal data and any third-party processors involved.
A small brochure site and a healthcare application don't need the same level of protection. What matters is that the safeguards actually match the risk.
Mistake 6: Pushing Maintenance to an Afterthought
Once the product's live, who's actually watching it? Who steps in if a payment fails or an update breaks an integration? And what response time can you expect on a Saturday night?
Get clarity on the difference between:
- the warranty covering launch-related defects;
- corrective maintenance;
- preventive updates;
- user support;
- new feature development.
An SLA is only worth the paper it's written on if the priorities, coverage hours, and response times are actually spelled out.
Check for: a clear maintenance offer, an incident-handling process, and what's excluded, plus pricing.
Mistake 7: Believing Promises That Can't Actually Be Verified
Be wary of absolute guarantees: a #1 ranking on Google, zero bugs ever, a fixed deadline for a scope that's still undefined, or "unlimited" capacity with no architecture to back it up.
A credible agency will also lay out the conditions, dependencies, and risks involved — not just the upside. They'll tell you what's actually measurable and what depends on factors outside their control.
Ask for proof that fits each specific promise: a demo, a verifiable reference, a documented method, a test plan, or a contractual commitment. A team that's careful and precise is worth far more than one that's confident about something it can't actually deliver.
Pre-Signature Checklist
- Is the scope — and what's excluded — actually in writing?
- Are the acceptance criteria testable, not just aspirational?
- Are the rights to the code and design clearly spelled out?
- Do the critical accounts belong to your company, not the agency's?
- Do the security measures actually match your risk level?
- Is maintenance and incident response actually organized?
- Can the big promises actually be backed up with proof?
If any of these come back unclear, ask for written clarification before you sign. It takes far less time than fixing a project after the fact.
MONARK IT supports projects from initial scoping all the way through maintenance, with an approach shaped around websites, web applications, mobile products, and business platforms. You can also check out our approach as a web agency in Marrakech.
Get a second opinion on your project's scope before you commit
